Psychology: Techniques and Application ›› 2019, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (11): 683-692.doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2019.11.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Psychological Processing Mechanism of Empathy

  

  1. (1School of psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210024, China) (2 Mental Health Education and Counseling Center, City college of Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523000, China)
  • Online:2019-11-01 Published:2019-11-01

Abstract: Empathy is a critical social ability to identify what other people feel or think and to respond with an adequate emotion to others feelings and thoughts. It can be divided into affective empathy and cognitive empathy, each of which has relatively independent neural network. In terms of evolution and ontogeny, affective empathy happens before cognitive empathy. There are two processing methods of empathy. One is the bottom-up empathy processing evoked by elementary emotion stimulation. First, emotional infection occurs, which in turn evokes affective empathy. Finally, cognitive empathy and affective empathy interact to produce empathy response. The other one is a top-down empathy processing triggered by advanced emotional information. Cognitive empathy evokes affective empathy through self-reflection, in which Medial Prefrontal Cortex plays a significant role. This article present a model that called Brain circuits for empathy which explains the component and process of empathy, and demonstrate the psychological processing mechanism of empathy. Future studies are needed to design a high ecological validity research paradigm, explore more objective empathy measurements, and enrich the positive empathy study.

Key words: affective empathy, cognitive empathy, bottom-up processing, top-down processing

CLC Number: 

  • B842.6
[1] WANG Xieshun, SU Yanjie. Revision of QCAE Empathy Scale for Chinese Adolescents [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2019, 7(9): 536-547.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] SUN Ling, SONG Xiaoxing, ZHOU Zhanqiang, MENG Xiangyi, XIN Ziqiang. The Concept, Construct and Measurement of Financial Knowledge[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 459 -464 .
[2] XIN Zhiyong, YU Yonghong, XIN Ziqiang. Research Progress and Conceptual Construct Analysis of Financial Values[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[3] WEI Xiao, LAN Jijun. Analysis of the Present Situation and Trend of Psychology Researchin China in Recent 10 Years ——Take the Dissertation Distribution of the 14th-19th China Congress of Psychology as an Example[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[4] ZHANG Hongchuan, SU Song, LV Jieyu, ZHANG Mei, XIN Ziqiang. Financial Capacity Based on the Rational Decision-Making View: Concept, Construct and Measurement [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 465 -471 .
[5] HUANG Zihang, , WANG Ke, CAI Huajian, . Conducting Psychological Studies via Open Data[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 549 -569 .
[6] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 580 -581 .
[7] HU Jinhui, XIN Cong, CHEN Youzhen. Effects of Encoding Strategies and the Salience of Cues on Prospective Memory[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 537 -542 .
[8] YUAN Shangqing, SUN Tie, ZHENG Luming, XIAO Feng. The Effect of Stress on Implicit Time Underlying Different Dynamic Conditions[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 543 -548 .
[9] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 583 -586 .
[10] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 590 -592 .