Psychology: Techniques and Application ›› 2020, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (7): 406-413.doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2020.07.003

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Measurement Invariance of the Sub-questionnaires of Chinese Physician-Patient Social Mentality Questionnaire Across Gender

JIANG He ; ZHAO Li   

  1. (1 Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China)
    (2 Computational Social Science Laboratory, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China)
  • Online:2020-07-01 Published:2020-07-02

Abstract: In order to further verify the factor structures of the sub-questionnaires of Chinese physician-patient social mentality questionnaire, and to test the measurement invariance of the questionnaire in different genders, 3787 physicians and 4502 patients were tested in this study. A validation factor analysis and a measurement invariance test were performed. Results showed that the three-factor model of the physician-patient satisfaction-1(medical/patient version), and the three-factor model of the physician-patient satisfaction-2(patient version), the subscales of health notion(medical version/patient version) and the disease notion(medical version) were fitted well. The morphological equivalent model, weak equivalent model, strong equivalent model, and strict equivalent model of the physician-patient satisfaction-1(patient version), the physician-patient satisfaction-2(patient version), and the subscales of health notion(patient version) in different genders were all acceptable. These indicate that the measurement invariance of the aforementioned three questionnaires held across gender.

Key words:  physician-patient relationship, physician-patient trust, physician-patient social mentality, measurement invariance

CLC Number: 

  • B841.2
[1] ZHANG Zirui, LV Xiaokang. Measurement Invariance of the Chinese Physician-Patient Trust Scales Across Gender [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(7): 397-405.
[2] LIU Ying, WANG Xinjian. The Reliability and Validity Tests of Chinese Physician-Patient Social Mentality Questionnaire-Patient Section in Minority Areas [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(7): 386-396.
[3] SHE Ai, WEI Guangbin, ZENG Lianping. Measurement Invariance of the Work-Family Balance Questionnaire in Different Genders [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(1): 60-64.
[4] YAN Zhiqiang, LIU Yue, PEI Meng, SU Yanjie. Revision and Validation of the Empathy Questionnaire [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2019, 7(9): 514-522.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] SUN Ling, SONG Xiaoxing, ZHOU Zhanqiang, MENG Xiangyi, XIN Ziqiang. The Concept, Construct and Measurement of Financial Knowledge[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 459 -464 .
[2] XIN Zhiyong, YU Yonghong, XIN Ziqiang. Research Progress and Conceptual Construct Analysis of Financial Values[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[3] WEI Xiao, LAN Jijun. Analysis of the Present Situation and Trend of Psychology Researchin China in Recent 10 Years ——Take the Dissertation Distribution of the 14th-19th China Congress of Psychology as an Example[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[4] ZHANG Hongchuan, SU Song, LV Jieyu, ZHANG Mei, XIN Ziqiang. Financial Capacity Based on the Rational Decision-Making View: Concept, Construct and Measurement [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 465 -471 .
[5] HUANG Zihang, , WANG Ke, CAI Huajian, . Conducting Psychological Studies via Open Data[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 549 -569 .
[6] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 580 -581 .
[7] HU Jinhui, XIN Cong, CHEN Youzhen. Effects of Encoding Strategies and the Salience of Cues on Prospective Memory[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 537 -542 .
[8] YUAN Shangqing, SUN Tie, ZHENG Luming, XIAO Feng. The Effect of Stress on Implicit Time Underlying Different Dynamic Conditions[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 543 -548 .
[9] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 583 -586 .
[10] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 590 -592 .