Psychology: Techniques and Application ›› 2021, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (8): 484-494.doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2021.08.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Incorporating Covariates Information in Polytomous Responses Cognitive Diagnosis Model

ZHOU Wenjie, GUO Lei   

  1. (1 Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)
    (2 Southwest University Branch, Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Chongqing 400715, China)
  • Online:2021-08-01 Published:2021-08-18

Abstract: Covariates play an important role in psychological and educational studies, which can be used as control variables or regulatory factors in modelling. A few studies involve covariates information in Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs). However, these studies have some issues that need to be solved. First, the current covariate extension models cannot analyze these polytomous responses. Second, the category covariates included in these studies are only dichotomous variables (such as gender). It cannot handle multi-category covariate information, such as grade and family socioeconomic status.
This paper proposed the GPDM-C (The covariate extension of General polytomous diagnosis model) that incorporates both continuous and multi-category covariates in the polytomous response cognitive diagnosis framework. For simplicity, the saturated GPDM-C model was constrained as a reduced model, named the GPDINA-C model. MCMC algorithm was implemented in JAGS software to complete parameter estimation.
In order to evaluate the parameter estimation accuracy of the GPDINA-C model, showing the advantages of incorporatingcovariates in the polytomous responses model, three factors (item quality, test length, and covariates effect size) were considered in a simulation study. The results indicated that: (1) The MCMC algorithm can accurately estimate all GPDINA-C model parameters. (2) Both person parameters and structure parameters recovery of GPDINA-C outperform the recovery of GPDINA.
Finally, an empirical research is applied to examine the performance of the GPDINA-C model in practice. The results indicate that GPDINA-C hada smaller DIC value than the GPDINA model did, which manifests that the GPDINA-C had a better fit for this empirical data. Furthermore, the covariates parameters of the GPDINA-C can infer the influence of covariates on attribute mastery objectively.

Key words: cognitive diagnosis, covariates information, polytomous responses cognitive diagnosis model, MCMC

CLC Number: 

  • B841
[1] YANG Yakun, ZHU Shihao, LIU Xinling. A Method of Q-matrix Estimation Based on Item Fit Statistic RMSEA [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(1): 51-59.
[2] LI Tingting, GUO Lei, LI Shuai, GAO Jingjie. The Review of Autism Spectrum Disorders Assessment Tools [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2019, 7(2): 107-117.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] SUN Ling, SONG Xiaoxing, ZHOU Zhanqiang, MENG Xiangyi, XIN Ziqiang. The Concept, Construct and Measurement of Financial Knowledge[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 459 -464 .
[2] XIN Zhiyong, YU Yonghong, XIN Ziqiang. Research Progress and Conceptual Construct Analysis of Financial Values[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[3] WEI Xiao, LAN Jijun. Analysis of the Present Situation and Trend of Psychology Researchin China in Recent 10 Years ——Take the Dissertation Distribution of the 14th-19th China Congress of Psychology as an Example[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[4] ZHANG Hongchuan, SU Song, LV Jieyu, ZHANG Mei, XIN Ziqiang. Financial Capacity Based on the Rational Decision-Making View: Concept, Construct and Measurement [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 465 -471 .
[5] HUANG Zihang, , WANG Ke, CAI Huajian, . Conducting Psychological Studies via Open Data[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 549 -569 .
[6] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 580 -581 .
[7] HU Jinhui, XIN Cong, CHEN Youzhen. Effects of Encoding Strategies and the Salience of Cues on Prospective Memory[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 537 -542 .
[8] YUAN Shangqing, SUN Tie, ZHENG Luming, XIAO Feng. The Effect of Stress on Implicit Time Underlying Different Dynamic Conditions[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 543 -548 .
[9] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 583 -586 .
[10] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 590 -592 .