Psychology: Techniques and Application ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3): 170-178.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The General and Specific Factors of The Zhong-Yong Thinking:A Bifactor Perspective

  

  • Online:2024-03-01 Published:2024-03-04

Abstract:

With a sample of 2,867 Chinese undergraduates, this study explored the general and specific factors of the Zhong-Yong thinking Style Scale (ZYTSC) from a bifactor perspective. The results showed that the general factor was more dominant than the specific factor. Nevertheless, after controlling the general factor, the variance of multi-thinking and harmony still accounted for 23% and 26%, respectively, indicating specific factors such as multi-thinking and harmony were also significant; Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis supported measurement invariance of bifactor model of the Zhong-Yong thinking Style Scale at scalar level across different genders and grades. This study suggests that the Zhong-Yong thinking Style Scale measures both the general and the specific of Zhong-Yong thinking. The implication for Zhong-Yong thinking and application of the Zhong-Yong thinking Style Scale has been also discussed.

Key words: the Zhong-Yong thinking, bifactor model, measurement invariance

CLC Number: 

  • B849
[1] ZHANG Zirui, LV Xiaokang. Measurement Invariance of the Chinese Physician-Patient Trust Scales Across Gender [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(7): 397-405.
[2] JIANG He , ZHAO Li. Measurement Invariance of the Sub-questionnaires of Chinese Physician-Patient Social Mentality Questionnaire Across Gender [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(7): 406-413.
[3] SHE Ai, WEI Guangbin, ZENG Lianping. Measurement Invariance of the Work-Family Balance Questionnaire in Different Genders [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(1): 60-64.
[4] YAN Zhiqiang, LIU Yue, PEI Meng, SU Yanjie. Revision and Validation of the Empathy Questionnaire [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2019, 7(9): 514-522.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] XIN Zhiyong, YU Yonghong, XIN Ziqiang. Research Progress and Conceptual Construct Analysis of Financial Values[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[2] WEI Xiao, LAN Jijun. Analysis of the Present Situation and Trend of Psychology Researchin China in Recent 10 Years ——Take the Dissertation Distribution of the 14th-19th China Congress of Psychology as an Example[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[3] HAN Pu, ZHANG Feng, LEI Xiuya. The Relationships of Childrens Kinetic School Drawings and its Self-sense of Power[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 522 -527 .
[4] XIN Ziqiang, ZHANG Hongchuan, SUN Ling, YU Yonghong, XIN Zhiyong. The Definition and Triarchic Structure of Financial Literacy[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 450 -458 .
[5] ZHANG Hongchuan, SU Song, LV Jieyu, ZHANG Mei, XIN Ziqiang. Financial Capacity Based on the Rational Decision-Making View: Concept, Construct and Measurement [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 465 -471 .
[6] ZHANG Jingjing, YU Zhenzhen, TIAN Hao. An Integrated Model of Emotion and Ration on Pro-environmental Behavior: The Role of Ecological Emotion Involvement[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 484 -492 .
[7] HU Jinhui, XIN Cong, CHEN Youzhen. Effects of Encoding Strategies and the Salience of Cues on Prospective Memory[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 537 -542 .
[8] YUAN Shangqing, SUN Tie, ZHENG Luming, XIAO Feng. The Effect of Stress on Implicit Time Underlying Different Dynamic Conditions[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 543 -548 .
[9] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 579 -589 .
[10] YU Xide, LU Cheng, GAO Dingguo. The relationships among Feeling of the Passage of Time,  Time Perspective and Personality[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 493 -502 .