心理技术与应用 ›› 2020, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3): 140-147.doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2020.03.002

• • 上一篇    下一篇

心理距离对消费者评估多功能产品的影响:基础功能和附加功能的差异

苗晓燕,刘 宁   

  1. (山东师范大学心理学院, 济南 250358)
  • 出版日期:2020-03-01 发布日期:2020-03-03
  • 基金资助:
    山东师范大学大学生创新创业训练项目(201510445241)。

Effect of Psychological Distance on Consumers Evaluation for Multifunctional Product: Difference Between Primary Feature and Secondary Feature

MIAO Xiaoyan; LIU Ning   

  1. (School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Online:2020-03-01 Published:2020-03-03

摘要: 本研究从解释水平理论出发,探讨了心理距离对消费者评估多功能产品的影响。研究首先检验了消费者对多功能产品基础功能和附加功能的解释水平表征差异(实验1),结果发现消费者以高解释水平表征多功能产品的基础功能,以低解释水平表征多功能产品的附加功能;之后分别操纵时间距离(实验2)和社会距离(实验3),探讨了心理距离对消费者评估不同类型多功能产品的影响,结果发现对于基础功能占优势的产品,消费者在远时间距离(远社会距离)条件下对产品的评估优于近时间距离(近社会距离);而对于附加功能占优势的产品,消费者在近时间距离(近社会距离)条件下对产品的评估优于远时间距离(远社会距离)。结果表明,心理距离影响消费者对不同类型多功能产品的评估,且基础功能占优与附加功能占优的多功能产品之间存在差异,消费者在远心理距离时对基础功能占优产品的评估优于近心理距离,在近心理距离时对附加功能占优产品的评估优于远心理距离。

关键词: 产品评估, 心理距离, 解释水平, 基础功能, 附加功能

Abstract: As market competitiveness grows, more and more multifunctional products are developed to increase brand competitiveness by providing additional features. Multifunctional products provide not only primary features (e.g. broadcasting function of radio) but also secondary features (e.g. Time function of radio). Based on the Construal Level Theory, we explored how the consumers represented the primary features and secondary features of multifunctional products (Study 1). The findings showed that the primary features of the multifunctional product were represented as highconstrual level by consumers, whereas the secondary features of the multifunctional product were represented as lowconstrual level. Then we investigated the effect of psychological distance (temporal and social distance) on consumers evaluations for multifunctional products (Study 2 and Study 3). The results showed that participants under distant temporal distance (far social distance) reported higher evaluations for the products with dominant primary features than participants under near temporal distance (close social distance). However, participants under near temporal distance (close social distance) reported higher evaluations for the products with dominant secondary features than those under distant temporal distance (far social distance). The results indicate that the psychological distance influence consumers evaluations for multifunctional products, and there are evaluation differences between products with dominant primary feature and products with dominant secondary feature.


Key words:  product evaluation, psychological distance, construal level, primary feature, secondary feature

中图分类号: 

  • B849
[1] 娄 宇, 单雪菲, 刘 宁. 权力与框架对风险寻求的影响:解释水平的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(4): 193-207.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 辛自强, 张红川, 孙铃, 于泳红, 辛志勇. 财经素养的内涵与三元结构[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 450 -458 .
[2] 张晶晶, 余真真, 田 浩. 亲环境行为的情理整合模型:生态情感卷入的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 484 -492 .
[3] 余习德, 鲁 成, 高定国. 时间流逝感与时间观、人格之间的关系研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 493 -502 .
[4] 陈必忠. 社交网站积极自我呈现与主观幸福感:多重中介模型[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 528 -536 .
[5] 寇彧. 亲社会心态培育是社会心理服务的重要内容[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 595 .
[6] 张林. 积极老龄化视角下老年心理服务体系建设的研究与实践[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 597 -598 .
[7] 刘洋, 刘筱萌, 李爽怡, 万造君, 苑媛. 家长式领导对工作满意度的影响:上下级关系的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 513 -521 .
[8] 韩 璞, 张 凤, 雷秀雅. 不同自我权力感知儿童的学校动力绘画特征[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 522 -527 .
[9] 林 桐, 王 娟. 基于视觉情境范式的口语词汇理解研究进展[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 570 -576 .
[10] 周莉. 学生心理健康服务可从学校和家长入手[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 599 .