心理技术与应用 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (8): 449-459.

• •    下一篇

温暖教养亲子感知差异与儿童情绪适应:基于潜在剖面分析的证据

  

  • 出版日期:2023-08-01 发布日期:2023-08-05

Relationship Between Parent-Child Perception Discrepancies in Parental Warmth and Children’s Emotional Adaptation:Evidence Based on Latent Profile Analysis

  • Online:2023-08-01 Published:2023-08-05

摘要:

基于以个体为中心的视角,使用潜剖面分析的方法考察温暖教养亲子感知差异的亚类型及其与儿童情绪适应之间的关系。以2557名五年级的学生及其家长为研究对象,采用温暖教养问卷、儿童抑郁量表和主观幸福感量表为研究工具。结果发现:温暖教养亲子感知差异模式可以分为亲子感知一致高、父母双方感知高、父亲孩子感知差异大三种亚类型;在三种家庭中,处于更高SES水平的家庭更有可能为亲子感知一致高的家庭,其儿童在两个时间点均拥有更高的主观幸福感和更低的抑郁。

关键词: 温暖教养, 亲子感知差异, 情绪适应, 潜剖面分析

Abstract:

To investigate the effects of parent-child perception discrepancies in parental warmth on children’s emotional adaptation, 2557 fifth-graders and their parents were surveyed with four items on parental warmth. Specifically, children were asked to complete the Child Depression Scale and the Subjective Well-Being Scale in the first year and the next year. Latent class analysis was used for data analysis. Our results showed that: (1) Three types of families were identified (i.e., families with consistently high parent-and-child perceptions, families with high parents’ perceptions, and families with big father-child perception discrepancies); (2) Among the three types of families, families at higher SES levels were more likely to have consistently high parent-child perception; (3) There were significant differences in the subjective well-being and depression of children across different types of families. At both T1 and T2, children from families with consistently high parent-and-child perceptions have higher subjective well-being levels and lower depression levels.

Key words: parental warmth, parent-child perception discrepancy, emotional adaptation, latent profile analysis

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] 侯牧天 唐燊 薛亦菲 王明辉 王宇拓 王惠敏. 中学生自伤、自杀意念的“双高”与“双低”模式:基于潜剖面分析方法[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2022, 10(2): 82-93.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 辛自强, 张红川, 孙铃, 于泳红, 辛志勇. 财经素养的内涵与三元结构[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 450 -458 .
[2] 孙 铃, 宋晓星, 周战强, 孟祥轶, 辛自强. 财经知识的概念、结构和测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 459 -464 .
[3] 张红川, 苏 凇, 吕杰妤, 张 梅, 辛自强. 基于理性决策的财经能力:概念、结构与测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 465 -471 .
[4] 辛志勇, 于泳红, 辛自强. 财经价值观研究进展及其概念结构分析[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[5] 张晶晶, 余真真, 田 浩. 亲环境行为的情理整合模型:生态情感卷入的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 484 -492 .
[6] 余习德, 鲁 成, 高定国. 时间流逝感与时间观、人格之间的关系研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 493 -502 .
[7] 韦 晓, 兰继军. 近10年我国心理学研究现状与趋势分析——以第14~19届全国心理学大会论文分布为例[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[8] 韩 璞, 张 凤, 雷秀雅. 不同自我权力感知儿童的学校动力绘画特征[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 522 -527 .
[9] 刘洋, 刘筱萌, 李爽怡, 万造君, 苑媛. 家长式领导对工作满意度的影响:上下级关系的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 513 -521 .
[10] 陈必忠. 社交网站积极自我呈现与主观幸福感:多重中介模型[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 528 -536 .