心理技术与应用 ›› 2026, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 333-344.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

中文发展性阅读障碍儿童亚类型分析

  

  1. 新疆心智发展与学习科学重点实验室;新疆师范大学心理学院;雅安市教育科学研究院
  • 接受日期:2026-02-25 出版日期:2026-05-29 发布日期:2026-05-29
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(32560202)

Analysis on Subtypes of Chinese Children with Developmental Dyslexia

  1. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Mental Development and Learning Science; School of Psychology, Xinjiang Normal University; Ya’an Institute of Educational Science
  • Accepted:2026-02-25 Online:2026-05-29 Published:2026-05-29

摘要:

为探讨发展性阅读障碍儿童的认知加工缺陷亚类型,采用语音意识测验、快速命名测验、语音记忆测验、正字法测验及视觉加工测验对发展性阅读障碍儿童与生理年龄匹配的对照组儿童进行测查,并运用方差分析和标准差切分法对数据进行分析。结果发现:中文发展性阅读障碍儿童存在多种认知加工缺陷亚类型,其中快速命名缺陷的检出率相对最高,其次为语音意识缺陷和视觉加工缺陷,语音记忆缺陷和正字法缺陷的占比较低;在混合型缺陷中,视觉加工缺陷、语音意识缺陷和快速命名缺陷三者共存表现出较高的稳定性;未发现单一视觉加工缺陷型,该类缺陷均与其他缺陷共存。此外,样本中有34%的阅读障碍儿童在各项认知测验上未达到缺陷标准,被归类为“认知能力轻微落后型”群体,未能被划分到任何亚类型中。这一结果表明,当前基于单一认知缺陷阈值的分类框架难以覆盖所有阅读障碍儿童。上述发现尚需在更大样本中进一步验证。

关键词: 发展性阅读障碍, 认知加工缺陷, 亚类型

Abstract:

To explore the subtypes of cognitive processing deficits in children with developmental dyslexia, this study administered phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming, phonological memory, orthographic processing, and visual processing tasks to children with developmental dyslexia and chronologically age-matched controls. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and standard deviation cutoff methods. The results revealed that Chinese children with developmental dyslexia exhibited multiple subtypes of cognitive processing deficits. Among these, the prevalence of rapid automatized naming deficits was the highest, followed by phonological awareness deficits and visual processing deficits, while phonological memory and orthographic deficits were less common. In mixed deficits, the co-occurrence of visual processing, phonological awareness, and rapid automatized naming deficits showed relatively high stability. Notably, no pure visual processing deficit subtype was identified, as visual deficits always co-occurred with other deficits. Additionally, 34% of dyslexic children in this sample did not meet the deficit criteria on any cognitive task and were classified as a“ mild cognitive delay” group, who could not be assigned to any established subtype. These findings indicate that current classification frameworks based on single cognitive deficit thresholds fail to capture all children with dyslexia. Further validation with a larger sample is warranted.

Key words: developmental dyslexia, cognitive processing deficits, subtypes

中图分类号: 

  • B842
[1] 向祖强 付星河 许文 李苏玲. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童视觉空间信息加工能力的可塑性:基于心理旋转实验 [J]. 心理技术与应用, 2024, 12(9): 550-561.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘洋, 刘筱萌, 李爽怡, 万造君, 苑媛. 家长式领导对工作满意度的影响:上下级关系的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 513 -521 .
[2] 陈必忠. 社交网站积极自我呈现与主观幸福感:多重中介模型[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 528 -536 .
[3] 胡锦慧, 辛 聪, 陈幼贞. 编码方式和线索显著性对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 537 -542 .
[4] 黄梓航, 王 可, 蔡华俭, . 利用开放数据进行心理学研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 549 -569 .
[5] 吕小康, 汪新建. 从“社会心理服务体系”到“公共心理服务体系”[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 582 .
[6] 谢天. 社会心理服务中的三类人[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 590 -592 .
[7] 张晶晶, 余真真, 田 浩. 亲环境行为的情理整合模型:生态情感卷入的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 484 -492 .
[8] 余习德, 鲁 成, 高定国. 时间流逝感与时间观、人格之间的关系研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 493 -502 .
[9] 韦 晓, 兰继军. 近10年我国心理学研究现状与趋势分析——以第14~19届全国心理学大会论文分布为例[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[10] 辛自强, 张红川, 孙铃, 于泳红, 辛志勇. 财经素养的内涵与三元结构[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 450 -458 .