心理技术与应用 ›› 2020, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1): 33-40.doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2020.01.005

• • 上一篇    下一篇

道歉车语对驾驶员愤怒的抑制作用

孟 昊,马锦飞,冯 雨   

  1. (辽宁师范大学心理学院,大连 116029)
  • 出版日期:2020-01-01 发布日期:2020-01-06
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省社科规划基金项目-全面落实习近平社会治理思想,构建社区重点人口心理服务与干预体系(L18DKS004)。

Inhibitory Effect of Apologetic Vehicle Signal on Driver's Anger

MENG Hao; MA Jinfei; FENG Yu   

  1. (School of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China)
  • Online:2020-01-01 Published:2020-01-06

摘要: 本研究探讨道歉车语对驾驶员愤怒的作用。采用情境问卷对618名驾驶员进行测试,采取单因素组间设计的研究方法,自变量包括车语组和无车语组两个水平,因变量是每个情境的愤怒等级评分以及责任推断评分。结果显示在有道歉车语的情境中,驾驶员责任推断的分数明显降低,驾驶员的愤怒情绪也明显降低。回归分析表明,驾驶员对攻击性驾驶员的责任推断越多,对其产生的愤怒情绪也越多。这表明道歉车语可以明显减少被攻击驾驶员的敌意性责任推断,进而减少愤怒情绪;道歉车语对被攻击驾驶员的愤怒等级有明显的抑制作用。

关键词: 道歉车语, 驾驶员愤怒, 责任推断

Abstract: This study aimed to explore the effect of apologetic vehicle signal on drivers' anger. 618 drivers were tested with the situation questionnaire. This study adopted a single-factor inter-group design, in which the independent variables were divided into two levels: the vehicle signal group and the non-vehicle signal group. And the dependent variables were the anger score and the responsibility inference score of each situation. The results show that the scores of drivers responsibility inference and the anger are significantly reduced in the situation of apologetic vehicle signal. Regression analysis shows that the more drivers responsibility inference to aggressive drivers, the more anger they would have. This shows that drivers who use apologetic vehicle signal can obviously reduce other drivershostile responsibility referring to them and decrease their anger. The apologetic vehicle signal has a significant effect on the drivers' anger, and they restrain drivers' score of anger.

Key words: apologetic vehicle signal, driversanger, responsibility referring

中图分类号: 

  • B849
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘洋, 刘筱萌, 李爽怡, 万造君, 苑媛. 家长式领导对工作满意度的影响:上下级关系的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 513 -521 .
[2] 韩 璞, 张 凤, 雷秀雅. 不同自我权力感知儿童的学校动力绘画特征[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 522 -527 .
[3] 林 桐, 王 娟. 基于视觉情境范式的口语词汇理解研究进展[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 570 -576 .
[4] 辛自强, 许燕. “社会心理服务的实践与研究”专题简介[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 577 -578 .
[5] 王俊秀. 社会心理学如何响应社会心理服务体系建设[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 579 -589 .
[6] 吕小康, 汪新建. 从“社会心理服务体系”到“公共心理服务体系”[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 582 .
[7] 姜明照, 孙 铃, 张红川. 社会经济地位与肥胖的关系及其解释机制[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 622 -628 .
[8] 辛自强, 张红川, 孙铃, 于泳红, 辛志勇. 财经素养的内涵与三元结构[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 450 -458 .
[9] 张晶晶, 余真真, 田 浩. 亲环境行为的情理整合模型:生态情感卷入的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 484 -492 .
[10] 余习德, 鲁 成, 高定国. 时间流逝感与时间观、人格之间的关系研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 493 -502 .