心理技术与应用 ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (5): 283-295.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

中文词语远距离联想测验的编制及初步探索

  

  • 出版日期:2024-05-01 发布日期:2024-04-28

Development and Preliminary Exploration of Chinese Word Remote Associates Test

  • Online:2024-05-01 Published:2024-04-28

摘要:

远距离联想测验(RAT)及其变式复合远距离联想测验(CRAT)是揭示聚合思维和顿悟认知神经机制最常用的实验材料,也是评估个体创造性潜能的常用测试。相较于CRAT,RAT更适合跨文化研究。但由于语言文化差异以及中文词语联结方式的多样性,直接修订RAT并不可取,亟需发展中文词语远距离联想测验(CWRAT)。基于经典的联结层级理论和中文语境下的联结特性,研究采用等级计分模式,编制了80个CWRAT条目,并丰富了条目的难度、顿悟感以及联结方式等参数信息。效度检验显示CWRAT与创造性类比推理、创造性成就、经验开放性显著相关。采用潜在类别分析,以联结方式为分类指标对条目进行分类。结果显示CWRAT条目可划分为三个类别,C1和C3类别主要包含象征和比喻联结,条目表现出更高的顿悟感,而涉及更多常规性联想的C2类别表现出较低的顿悟感和难度。该结果表明CWRAT的顿悟体验的差异受到不同联结方式的影响。该测量不仅丰富了现有中文创造性测评工具库,也为创造性的跨文化比较提供了新的实验材料。

关键词: 远距离联想测验, 联结层级, 创造性, 语义距离

Abstract:

Remote associates test (RAT) and its variant Compound RAT (CRAT) are the most commonly used experimental materials to reveal the neural mechanism of convergent thinking and insight, as well as to measure individual creative potential. Compared with CRAT, RAT is more suitable for cross-cultural research. However, direct revisions to the RAT are unsuitable due to linguistic and cultural differences and the diversity in Chinese word association methods, necessitating the development of the Chinese Word RAT (CWRAT). Based on the classical hierarchical theory of association and the association characteristics in Chinese context, this study developed 80 CWRAT items, enhancing item parameters such as difficulty, insight level, and association methods. Given the non-uniqueness of answers, a gradient scoring model was implemented.Validity tests indicated significant correlations of CWRAT with creative analogical reasoning, creative achievement, and openness to experience. Using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) with association methods as classification indicators, the items were categorized into three groups. C1 and C3, characterized by higher probabilities of symbolic/metaphorical associations, showed higher levels of insight, whereas C2, involving more conventional associations, indicated lower levels of insight and difficulty. These results demonstrate that the variance in the insight experience of CWRAT is influenced by different association methods. This measurement not only enriches the toolkit for assessing creativity in the Chinese context but also provides new material for cross-cultural comparisons in creativity.

Key words: remote associates test, association hierarchy, creativity, semantic distance

中图分类号: 

  • B842
[1] 任 芬 刘 洋 王燕学 陈功香. 工作记忆容量与错误信息持续影响效应的关系:创造性的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2020, 8(10): 604-610.
[2] 袁 媛. 执行功能在创造性顿悟中的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(9): 565-572.
[3] . 团队创造性及影响因素研究现状[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2016, 4(2): 102-109.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 辛自强, 张红川, 孙铃, 于泳红, 辛志勇. 财经素养的内涵与三元结构[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 450 -458 .
[2] 张红川, 苏 凇, 吕杰妤, 张 梅, 辛自强. 基于理性决策的财经能力:概念、结构与测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 465 -471 .
[3] 张晶晶, 余真真, 田 浩. 亲环境行为的情理整合模型:生态情感卷入的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 484 -492 .
[4] 辛志勇, 于泳红, 辛自强. 财经价值观研究进展及其概念结构分析[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[5] 韦 晓, 兰继军. 近10年我国心理学研究现状与趋势分析——以第14~19届全国心理学大会论文分布为例[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[6] 刘洋, 刘筱萌, 李爽怡, 万造君, 苑媛. 家长式领导对工作满意度的影响:上下级关系的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 513 -521 .
[7] 韩 璞, 张 凤, 雷秀雅. 不同自我权力感知儿童的学校动力绘画特征[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 522 -527 .
[8] 胡锦慧, 辛 聪, 陈幼贞. 编码方式和线索显著性对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 537 -542 .
[9] 袁上清, 孙 铁, 郑鹭鸣, 肖 风. 应激对不同动态条件的内隐时间特征的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 543 -548 .
[10] 余习德, 鲁 成, 高定国. 时间流逝感与时间观、人格之间的关系研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 493 -502 .