financial scarcity, gender discrimination/sexism, life history strategy, SC-IAT ,"/> <div style="text-align:justify;"> 经济稀缺心态如何滋生性别偏见?生命史策略的调节作用 </div>

心理技术与应用 ›› 2026, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 345-358.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

经济稀缺心态如何滋生性别偏见?生命史策略的调节作用

  

  1. 中央财经大学社会与心理学院心理学系
  • 接受日期:2025-12-24 出版日期:2026-05-29 发布日期:2026-05-29
  • 基金资助:
    北京市社会科学基金(23SRB004);中央财经大学第七批青年科研创新团队支持计划项目资助。

The Impact of Economic Scarcity on Gender Discrimination: The Moderating Role of Life History Strategies

  1. Department of Psychology, School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics
  • Accepted:2025-12-24 Online:2026-05-29 Published:2026-05-29

摘要:

经济稀缺会引起个体的决策和认知偏差。基于稀缺理论和生命史理论,通过4项研究系统考察经济稀缺感对性别歧视的影响及其调节机制。研究1基于中国综合社会调查数据集(子研究1a)和问卷调查(子研究1b),发现经济稀缺感正向预测外显性别歧视态度。研究2采用单类内隐联想测验,发现秋招情境下高稀缺感个体表现出更强的内隐性别偏见。研究3通过情境实验,发现稀缺情境下的个体在外显性别歧视量表上的得分显著提升。研究4进一步揭示生命史策略的调节作用:快生命史策略个体在经济稀缺条件下性别歧视倾向增强,而慢生命史策略个体则能缓冲这一效应。研究通过整合稀缺认知与进化心理学视角,揭示经济稀缺加剧性别偏见的心理机制,为理解经济环境与社会偏见的关系提供新启示。

关键词: 经济稀缺感, 性别歧视, 生命史策略, 单类内隐联想测验

Abstract:

Economic scarcity often leads to decision-making and cognitive biases. Drawing on scarcity theory and life history theory, this research systematically examined how perceived economic scarcity influences gender discrimination and how life history strategies moderate this relationship across four studies. Study 1, based on data from the Chinese General Social Survey(CGSS2021) (Study 1a) and a questionnaire survey (Study 1b), found that perceived economic scarcity positively predicted explicit gender-discriminatory attitudes. Study 2 employed a Single-Category Implicit Association Test (SC-IAT) to demonstrate that participants exposed to financial scarcity exhibited stronger implicit gender bias in the hiring context. Study 3 employed a scenario experiment and revealed that participants in scarcity conditions scored significantly higher on explicit gender discrimination measures. Study 4 further demonstrated the moderating role of life history strategies: individuals with fast life history strategies showed stronger gender discrimination under economic scarcity, whereas those with slow strategies buffered this effect. Integrating ideas from scarcity cognition and evolutionary psychology, this research explains how economic scarcity Influences gender bias and offers new insights into the relationship between economic conditions and social prejudice.

Key words:

中图分类号: 

  • B849
[1] 肖凯文, 段锦云, 田晓明. 女职工在组织行为中的优势及局限性[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(12): 756-768.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李宝聪, 张雅明. 社交媒体使用对青少年主观幸福感的影响及其心理机制[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2025, 13(11): 691 -704 .
[2] 余诗婕, 张寒冰, 张艺娟, 叶慧莹, 沈丝楚. 越透明越耐心?信息透明度对等候意愿的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2026, 14(6): 321 -332 .
[3] 符加林, 王胜月, 马刚.
体验后悔、自我保护动机与玄学消费偏好
[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2026, 14(6): 359 -370 .
[4] 乔孟言, 赵凤青, 侯洁.
不同性别儿童的父母参与:异质性及教育焦虑的作用
[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2026, 14(6): 371 -384 .
[5] 买合甫来提·坎吉, 博思坦·马合木提江, 李肖琳. 中文发展性阅读障碍儿童亚类型分析[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2026, 14(6): 333 -344 .