心理技术与应用

心理技术与应用 ›› 2019, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (9): 536-547.doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2019.09.003

• • 上一篇    下一篇

中国青少年版认知和情感共情量表的修订

  

  1. (北京大学心理与认知科学学院, 行为与心理健康北京市重点实验室, 北京 100871)
  • 出版日期:2019-09-01 发布日期:2019-09-03
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(31571134, 31872782)资助。

Revision of QCAE Empathy Scale for Chinese Adolescents

  1. (School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
  • Online:2019-09-01 Published:2019-09-03

PDF (PC)

6358

摘要： 以中国10～15岁青少年为样本修订Reniers等(2011)的认知和情感共情量表。探索性(N=620)和验证性(N=480)因子分析表明，三因子的结构最适合当前样本。修订后的量表共保留17个条目，分为观点采择、在线模拟和情绪响应三个维度(内部一致性信度系数依次为0.79，0.71和0.76)。该量表不仅与格里菲斯共情量表具有良好的相关，而且还可以预测被试的亲社会倾向。综上，经修订，此量表具有较好的信效度，适合作为评估我国青少年共情能力的工具。

关键词: 中国青少年, 认知共情, 情感共情, 亲社会倾向

Abstract: In a sample of Chinese adolescents aged 10～15, the present study revised the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE). The sample was randomly divided into two parts, part one (N=620) for exploratory factor analysis, and part two (N=480) for confirmatory factor analysis. Various indicators showed that a 3-factor structure was most suitable for the current sample. Finally, a total of 17 items were retained, which were divided into three subscales: Perspective Taking (PT), Online Simulation (OS), and Emotion Responsivity (ER). The internal consistency (Cronbachs α) was 0.79, 0.67 and 0.76, respectively. In addition, the revised QCAE not only had a high correlation with Chinese version of Griffith Empathy Measurement, but also could predict performance in “compliant” and “emotional” subscales of Chinese version of Prosocial Tendencies Measure for Adolescent. To sum up, the revised QCAE for Chinese adolescents has good internal consistency reliability, construct validity and criterion-related validity, and is a suitable instrument for the empathy of Chinese adolescents.

Key words: Chinese adolescents, cognitive empathy, emotional empathy, prosocial tendency

中图分类号: 

  • B841.7
[1] 袁晓劲, 刘 昌, 柳 林. 共情的心理加工过程机制[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(11): 683-692.
[2] . 内隐与外显亲社会倾向的影响因素研究：自尊的中介效应[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2016, 4(6): 356-364.
Viewed
Full text
5916
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 0 0 0 5916

  From Others local
  Times 921 4995
  Rate 16% 84%

Abstract
2683
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 2683
  From Others local
  Times 2602 81
  Rate 97% 3%

Cited
Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙 铃, 宋晓星, 周战强, 孟祥轶, 辛自强. 财经知识的概念、结构和测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 459 -464 .
[2] 辛志勇, 于泳红, 辛自强. 财经价值观研究进展及其概念结构分析[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[3] 韦 晓, 兰继军. 近10年我国心理学研究现状与趋势分析——以第14～19届全国心理学大会论文分布为例[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[4] 张红川, 苏 凇, 吕杰妤, 张 梅, 辛自强. 基于理性决策的财经能力：概念、结构与测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 465 -471 .
[5] 黄梓航, 王 可, 蔡华俭, . 利用开放数据进行心理学研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 549 -569 .
[6] 张红川. 从转化研究的角度理解心理学在社会服务中的功用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 580 -581 .
[7] 胡锦慧, 辛 聪, 陈幼贞. 编码方式和线索显著性对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 537 -542 .
[8] 袁上清, 孙 铁, 郑鹭鸣, 肖 风. 应激对不同动态条件的内隐时间特征的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 543 -548 .
[9] 陈雪峰. 用第三方评估促进社会心理服务体系建设[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 583 -586 .
[10] 谢天. 社会心理服务中的三类人[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 590 -592 .