心理技术与应用 ›› 2019, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (6): 332-339.doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2019.06.002

• • 上一篇    下一篇

情绪面孔注意偏向的可塑性:正性声音注意的影响

    

  1. (陕西师范大学心理学院暨陕西省行为与认知科学神经重点实验室,西安 710062)
  • 出版日期:2019-06-01 发布日期:2019-05-30

The Malleability of Attentional Bias towards Emotional Faces: The Effect of Attentional Processing to Positive Sounds

    

  1. (School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xian 710062, China)
  • Online:2019-06-01 Published:2019-05-30

摘要: 考察正性声音的注意加工对情绪面孔注意偏向的改变,及个体特质(积极倾向)在这一过程中的调节作用。采用听觉版点探测范式呈现声音刺激,靶声音总是与正性声音同耳播放,使得实验组被试总是加工正性听觉刺激,采用点探测范式测量被试对情绪面孔的注意偏向及其改变。结果发现,实验组对负性情绪面孔的解除困难显著减少,个体的积极倾向在负解除困难的改变中起调节作用,低积极倾向个体的改变更为显著。研究表明对正性声音的注意加工能够跨通道影响对情绪面孔的注意偏向,个体特征会调节注意偏向的改变,表明注意偏向的跨通道可塑性。

关键词: 正性声音, 情绪面孔, 负性解除困难, 积极倾向

Abstract: The aim of this research was to investigate how attentional biases towards emotional faces were impacted by attentional processing to auditory stimuli. There were sixty-seven college students recruited in this research and were randomly assigned to complete a computerized task designed to induce selective processing of positive sounds or to a sham condition with auditory adaption of dot-probe paradigm. The attentional biases to emotional faces were measured twice before and after the task with dot-probe paradigm. Our results revealed that participants who completed the computerized task showed more reduction of disengagement bias to angry faces compared to that in sham condition. Whats more, participants in the two groups didnt show different motion change in the whole experiment. We also measured individuals positivity and found that individuals positivity played a moderating role in attentional bias change. People with lower-level positivity obtained more reduction of disengagement bias toward angry faces. Our results support that attentional bias towards visual stimuli could be changed by processing of positive auditory stimuli, which showing great malleability, and is influenced by individual characteristics.

Key words: positive sounds, emotional faces, disengagement bias, positivity

中图分类号: 

  • B842.1
[1] 潘超超, 周爱保, 刘锦涛, 谢 珮. 情绪诱发情景下情绪面孔的注意偏向研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 600-605.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙 铃, 宋晓星, 周战强, 孟祥轶, 辛自强. 财经知识的概念、结构和测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 459 -464 .
[2] 辛志勇, 于泳红, 辛自强. 财经价值观研究进展及其概念结构分析[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[3] 韦 晓, 兰继军. 近10年我国心理学研究现状与趋势分析——以第14~19届全国心理学大会论文分布为例[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[4] 胡锦慧, 辛 聪, 陈幼贞. 编码方式和线索显著性对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 537 -542 .
[5] 袁上清, 孙 铁, 郑鹭鸣, 肖 风. 应激对不同动态条件的内隐时间特征的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 543 -548 .
[6] 陈雪峰. 用第三方评估促进社会心理服务体系建设[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 583 -586 .
[7] 赵然. EAP发展对社会心理服务体系建设的启发[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 587 .
[8] 池丽萍. 对社会心理服务体系建设实践的反思[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 588 -589 .
[9] 向光璨, 郭 成, 滕召军, 崔瑞芳. 父母与同伴依恋对大学新生心理适应性的影响:社会支持与希望感的多元中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 606 -612 .
[10] . 五种角色自主学习: 一种组织讨论的技术[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2016, 4(1): 1 -7 .