心理技术与应用 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (4): 212-221.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

低地位群体内-外群体评价的差异效应特征

  

  • 出版日期:2023-04-01 发布日期:2023-04-04

Characteristics of the Differential Effects of Inter-Out Group Evaluation in Low-status Groups

  • Online:2023-04-01 Published:2023-04-04

摘要:

通过两个实验从内隐和外显两个层面考察低地位群体内-外群体评价的差异效应特征。实验1选择低地位群体大学生,采用加工分离程序考察对内群体和外群体的内隐以及外显特质评价;实验2采用任务分离范式,从内隐和外显两个层面考察低地位群体内-外群体评价的差异效应特征。两个实验发现,在外显层面,低地位群体对外群体评价更高,表现为外群体偏好,但无内群体贬损;在内隐层面,能力维度的内-外群体评价的差异效应特征为外群体偏好和内群体贬损,而在热情维度则表现为外群体贬损,即低地位群体对内-外群体的评价模式出现了外显和内隐分离现象。两个实验共同说明低地位群体成员对内群体和外群体的评价具有内容多样性和心理水平的差异性。

关键词: 低地位群体, 刻板印象内容模型, 加工分离程序, 任务分离范式

Abstract:

According to social identity theory, group status is an important factor affecting the differential effects of inter-out group evaluation in low-status groups. The present study used two experiments to explore the characteristics of the differential effects of inter-out group evaluation in low-status groups both at the explicit and implicit levels. Experiment 1 selected low-status college students as participants and adopted the procedure dissociation procedure (PDP), to investigate the implicit and explicit trait processing of ingroup and outgroup. Experiment 2 adopted the task separation paradigm, from the explicit and implicit levels to explore the characteristics of the differential effects of inter-out group evaluation in low-status groups. The results of two experiments found that at the explicit level, the members of low-status group all have higher evaluation of outgroup, which is manifested as outgroup favoritism, but they do not devalue the ingroup, that is, no ingroup derogation. At the implicit level, the inter-out group effect on the competence dimension is characterized by outgroup favoritism and ingroup derogation, while the inter-out group effect on the warmth dimension is characterized by outgroup derogation. And the characteristics of the differential effects of inter-out group evaluation in low-status groups appeared the explicit and implicit separation. The two current experiments collectively illustrate the evaluation of low-status group members has content diversity and psychological differences between ingroup and outgroup.

Key words: lower-status groups, stereotype content model, procedure dissociation procedure, task

中图分类号: 

  • B849
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 辛自强, 张红川, 孙铃, 于泳红, 辛志勇. 财经素养的内涵与三元结构[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 450 -458 .
[2] 张红川, 苏 凇, 吕杰妤, 张 梅, 辛自强. 基于理性决策的财经能力:概念、结构与测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 465 -471 .
[3] 张晶晶, 余真真, 田 浩. 亲环境行为的情理整合模型:生态情感卷入的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 484 -492 .
[4] 孙 铃, 宋晓星, 周战强, 孟祥轶, 辛自强. 财经知识的概念、结构和测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 459 -464 .
[5] 辛志勇, 于泳红, 辛自强. 财经价值观研究进展及其概念结构分析[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[6] 韦 晓, 兰继军. 近10年我国心理学研究现状与趋势分析——以第14~19届全国心理学大会论文分布为例[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[7] 余习德, 鲁 成, 高定国. 时间流逝感与时间观、人格之间的关系研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 493 -502 .
[8] 陈必忠. 社交网站积极自我呈现与主观幸福感:多重中介模型[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 528 -536 .
[9] 黄梓航, 王 可, 蔡华俭, . 利用开放数据进行心理学研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 549 -569 .
[10] 刘洋, 刘筱萌, 李爽怡, 万造君, 苑媛. 家长式领导对工作满意度的影响:上下级关系的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 513 -521 .