心理技术与应用 ›› 2021, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1): 1-11.doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2021.01.001

• •    下一篇

不公平感知后的政府信任修复

吴旭秋,李伟强,袁 博   

  1. (宁波大学心理学系暨研究所,宁波 315211)
  • 出版日期:2021-01-01 发布日期:2021-01-05
  • 基金资助:
    本研究得到国家自然科学基金(31600914)和宁波大学王宽诚基金资助。

Government Trust Repair after the Unfairness Perception

WU Xuqiu; LI Weiqiang; YUAN Bo   

  1. (Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China)
  • Online:2021-01-01 Published:2021-01-05

摘要: 社会不公平事件发生后,如何有效修复政府信任,是值得探讨的重要问题。本研究采用情境实验问卷,通过两项实验探讨了不公平感知后的政府信任修复。结果发现,惩罚和监管策略可以有效修复受损后的政府信任,并且降低不公平感知以及失望与愤怒情绪,但沉默、补偿、道歉和承诺均不能达到信任修复效果。研究结果可为政府应对公共危机事件、制定相关政策法规,提升公民的政府信任水平提供科学的借鉴。

关键词: 社会公平, 政府信任, 信任受损, 信任修复

Abstract: Fairness is one of the core social norms of human society, and it plays a decisive role in personal survival and social development. However, it is still unclear which interventions should be taken efficiently to repair the government trust which is damaged by unfair events. Two experiments were used to explore which strategies(silence, apology, commitment, compensation, punishment, and supervision) could effectively restore the government trust after unfair perception. The results indicated that the strategies of punishment and supervision could effectively repair the government trust which was damaged, and reduce perception of unfairness as well as feelings of disappointment and anger. However, the strategies of silence, compensation, apology, and commitment failed to repair the government trust. In conclusion, the present results showed that only two behavioral repair strategies(punishment and supervision) could effectively repair the government trust. The current results provide scientific theory reference for government and institutions to set relevant policies and raising the level of social trust in citizens.

Key words: social fairness, government trust, trust damage, trust repair

中图分类号: 

  • B849
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张红川, 苏 凇, 吕杰妤, 张 梅, 辛自强. 基于理性决策的财经能力:概念、结构与测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 465 -471 .
[2] 黄梓航, 王 可, 蔡华俭, . 利用开放数据进行心理学研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 549 -569 .
[3] 张红川. 从转化研究的角度理解心理学在社会服务中的功用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 580 -581 .
[4] 孙 铃, 宋晓星, 周战强, 孟祥轶, 辛自强. 财经知识的概念、结构和测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 459 -464 .
[5] 辛志勇, 于泳红, 辛自强. 财经价值观研究进展及其概念结构分析[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[6] 韦 晓, 兰继军. 近10年我国心理学研究现状与趋势分析——以第14~19届全国心理学大会论文分布为例[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[7] 胡锦慧, 辛 聪, 陈幼贞. 编码方式和线索显著性对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 537 -542 .
[8] 袁上清, 孙 铁, 郑鹭鸣, 肖 风. 应激对不同动态条件的内隐时间特征的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 543 -548 .
[9] 陈雪峰. 用第三方评估促进社会心理服务体系建设[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 583 -586 .
[10] 赵然. EAP发展对社会心理服务体系建设的启发[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 587 .