心理技术与应用 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (8): 477-482.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

面部表情类型、强度和加工方式对孤独症儿童情绪理解的影响

  

  • 出版日期:2022-08-01 发布日期:2022-08-29

The Effects of Type, Intensity and Processing Method of Facial Expression on Emotional Understanding of Children with Autism

  • Online:2022-08-01 Published:2022-08-29

摘要:

采用实验法探讨面部表情类型、强度和加工方式对孤独症儿童情绪理解的影响机制。20名孤独症儿童参加了正式实验。结果表明:(1)孤独症儿童对不同面部表情的识别存在差异;(2)孤独症儿童对整体面部表情的正确识别率显著好于局部面部表情的正确识别率;(3)孤独症儿童对高强度面部表情的正确识别率显著好于低强度面部表情的正确识别率;(4)孤独症儿童面部表情加工方式和面部表情强度存在交互影响。在整体加工方式下,100%强度的表情识别正确率显著高于50%强度的表情识别正确率,在局部加工方式下,100%强度的表情识别正确率与50%强度的表情识别正确率差异不显著。结论:孤独症儿童情绪理解受到面部表情类型、强度和加工方式的影响。

关键词: 孤独症儿童, 面部表情识别, 情绪理解

Abstract:

This study used an experimental method to explore the effects of type, intensity and processing method of facial expression on emotional understanding of children with autism. Twenty autistic children participated in the formal experiment. The results showed: (1) There were differences in the recognition of different facial expressions in children with autism. (2) The correct recognition rate of overall facial expressions of autistic children was significantly better than the correct recognition rate of partial facial expressions. (3) The correct recognition rate of high-intensity facial expressions of autistic children was significantly better than that of low-intensity facial expressions. (4) The facial expression processing method and expression intensity of children with autism had an interactive influence. In the overall processing mode, the correct rate of expression recognition at 100% strength was significantly higher than that at 50% strength. In the partial processing mode, the correct rate of expression recognition at 100% strength and the correct rate at 50% strength were not significantly different. Conclusion: Emotion understanding of autistic children is affected by facial expression type, intensity and processing style.

Key words: autistic children, facial expression recognition, emotion understanding

中图分类号: 

  • B842.6
[1] 田 园, 刘富丽, 苏彦捷. 3~6岁儿童对消极情绪的理解:抑制控制与共情的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(6): 321-331.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 辛自强, 张红川, 孙铃, 于泳红, 辛志勇. 财经素养的内涵与三元结构[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 450 -458 .
[2] 孙 铃, 宋晓星, 周战强, 孟祥轶, 辛自强. 财经知识的概念、结构和测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 459 -464 .
[3] 张红川, 苏 凇, 吕杰妤, 张 梅, 辛自强. 基于理性决策的财经能力:概念、结构与测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 465 -471 .
[4] 张晶晶, 余真真, 田 浩. 亲环境行为的情理整合模型:生态情感卷入的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 484 -492 .
[5] 余习德, 鲁 成, 高定国. 时间流逝感与时间观、人格之间的关系研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 493 -502 .
[6] 韦 晓, 兰继军. 近10年我国心理学研究现状与趋势分析——以第14~19届全国心理学大会论文分布为例[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[7] 韩 璞, 张 凤, 雷秀雅. 不同自我权力感知儿童的学校动力绘画特征[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 522 -527 .
[8] 黄梓航, 王 可, 蔡华俭, . 利用开放数据进行心理学研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 549 -569 .
[9] 吕小康, 汪新建. 从“社会心理服务体系”到“公共心理服务体系”[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 582 .
[10] 辛志勇, 于泳红, 辛自强. 财经价值观研究进展及其概念结构分析[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .