心理技术与应用 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (9): 564-573.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

中文版心理幸福感量表在残疾人群体中的修订及应用

  

  • 出版日期:2022-09-01 发布日期:2022-09-26

Revision and Application of the Chinese Version of Ryff’s Scale of Psychological Well-being in People with Disabilities

  • Online:2022-09-01 Published:2022-09-26

摘要:

为检验中文版心理幸福感量表在残疾人群体中的信效度,并探讨人口学因素对残疾人心理幸福感的预测作用,通过残联渠道获取有效样本352人(项目分析和因素分析)和513人(信效度检验)。修订后的中文版心理幸福感量表(C-PWBS-16)共16题,包含环境掌控、生命成长、积极心态和自主四个因子,具有良好的结构效度、聚合效度、区分效度和效标效度;总量表和各因子的内部一致性信度在0.71~0.89之间,重测信度在0.76~0.93之间。残疾人心理幸福感的人口学差异表现在:女性高于男性、先天残疾高于后天残疾、重度残疾高于轻度残疾;受教育水平越高,心理幸福感越高;肢残者心理幸福感最低。综上,C-PWBS-16在残疾人群体中具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为测量残疾人心理幸福感的工具。

关键词: 心理幸福感, 心理幸福感量表, 残疾人

Abstract:

To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of Ryff’s Scale of Psychological Well-being (C-PWBS-42) in people with disabilities. Meanwhile, to explore demographic factors that affect the psychological well-being of the disabled. C-PWBS-42 and the revised C-PWBS-16 were administered to two valid sample (n1 = 352, n2 = 513) through Disabled Persons’Federation channels, respectively. Other 40 disabled persons were retested after an interval of 4 weeks. We found that the revised version of C-PWBS-42 include 16 items (C-PWBS-16), consisting of four factors, namely, environmental mastery, life growth, positive mind, and autonomy. C-PWBS-16 demonstrated satisfactory coefficients for construct, convergent, discriminant and criterion validity. Internal consistency reliability of total scale and four factors ranged from 0.71~0.91, and test-retest reliability ranged from 0.76~0.93. The demographic differences in psychological well-being of the disabled are as follows: women are higher than men, congenital disabilities are higher than acquired disabilities, and severe disabilities are higher than mild disabilities; the higher the level of education, the higher the psychological well-being; people with physical disabilities have the lowest psychological well-being. All in all, the revised C-PWBS-16 is reliable, valid, and suitable for measuring psychological well-being of people with disabilities. Gender, congenital/acquired disability, disability level, disability type and education level are important factors influencing psychological well-being of the disabled.

Key words: psychological Well-being, Scale of Psychological Well-being, people with disabilities

中图分类号: 

  • B849
[1] 刘 芳, 杜洪飞. 关系自尊:概念、测量和功能[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2020, 8(2): 121-128.
[2] . 大学生领悟社会支持和感恩在尽责性和心理幸福感间的序列中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2017, 5(3): 154-159.
[3] . 残疾人领悟社会支持对其社交回避及苦恼的影响:自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2016, 4(11): 648-655.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙 铃, 宋晓星, 周战强, 孟祥轶, 辛自强. 财经知识的概念、结构和测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 459 -464 .
[2] 辛志勇, 于泳红, 辛自强. 财经价值观研究进展及其概念结构分析[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[3] 韦 晓, 兰继军. 近10年我国心理学研究现状与趋势分析——以第14~19届全国心理学大会论文分布为例[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[4] 辛自强, 张红川, 孙铃, 于泳红, 辛志勇. 财经素养的内涵与三元结构[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 450 -458 .
[5] 张红川, 苏 凇, 吕杰妤, 张 梅, 辛自强. 基于理性决策的财经能力:概念、结构与测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 465 -471 .
[6] 张晶晶, 余真真, 田 浩. 亲环境行为的情理整合模型:生态情感卷入的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 484 -492 .
[7] 刘洋, 刘筱萌, 李爽怡, 万造君, 苑媛. 家长式领导对工作满意度的影响:上下级关系的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 513 -521 .
[8] 韩 璞, 张 凤, 雷秀雅. 不同自我权力感知儿童的学校动力绘画特征[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 522 -527 .
[9] 胡锦慧, 辛 聪, 陈幼贞. 编码方式和线索显著性对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 537 -542 .
[10] 余习德, 鲁 成, 高定国. 时间流逝感与时间观、人格之间的关系研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 493 -502 .