心理技术与应用 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2): 82-93.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

中学生自伤、自杀意念的“双高”与“双低”模式:基于潜剖面分析方法

  

  • 出版日期:2022-02-01 发布日期:2022-04-18

The “Double high” and “Double low” Patterns of Secondary School Students'Self-injury and Suicidal Ideation: Based on Latent Profile Analysis

  • Online:2022-02-01 Published:2022-04-18

摘要: 当下中学生自伤、自杀意念流行率较高,本研究旨在通过个体中心方法探讨中学生自伤、自杀意念的模式与关联因素。选取初高中生843人,调查了自伤行为、自杀意念与预测因素,进行潜剖面探索和Logistic回归。结果发现:(1)中学生自伤-自杀意念存在两个亚组,分别为“低自伤-低自杀意念组”(双低组)和“高自伤-高自杀意念组”(双高组),占比为89.32%和10.68%;(2)多因素Logistic回归表明睡眠质量不良、经验性回避和负性情绪是中学生自伤-自杀意念潜在类别的危险因素。本研究补充了中学生自伤、自杀意念有关研究,明确了中学生自伤-自杀意念的两种模式及其影响因素,为后续干预工作提供了实证支持。

关键词: 中学生, 自伤-自杀意念, 潜剖面分析

Abstract: In view of high prevalence of self-injury and suicidal ideation among secondary school students today, the current study aims to explore the pattern of self-injury and suicidal ideation and related factors through the individual-centered approach. A total of 843 secondary school students were investigated with self-injury, suicidal ideation and potential predictors. We applied latent profile analysis and logistic regression. The results revealed that(1)there were two subgroups of secondary school students: low self-injury/low suicidal ideation subgroup and high self-injury/high suicidal ideation subgroup, accounting for 89.3% and 10.7%, respectively;(2)Poor sleep quality, experiential avoidance, and negative emotions were risk factors for latent classes of self-injury and suicidal ideation among secondary school students. This study bridged the research gap in self-injury and suicidal ideation among secondary school students, clarified the two patterns of self-injury and suicidal ideation as well as related factors, and provided empirical support for the future intervention.

Key words: secondary school students, self-injury, suicidal ideation, latent profile analysis

中图分类号: 

  • B844
[1] 雷泽宇, 乌云特娜, 金童林. 中学生内在生活目标与主观幸福感的关系:基本心理需求的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2021, 9(5): 313-320.
[2] 黄大炜, 王张君, 刘 莉, 程生风, 韩 华, 曾练平. 孟子思想视角下的中学生良心:内涵、结构及测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(2): 88-106.
[3] . 时间流逝感:概念探索、问卷编制及其信效度研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2017, 5(9): 542-552.
[4] . 自我超越生命意义量表的结构与信效度研究——基于道家哲学和佛教哲学的分析与思考[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2017, 5(2): 65-72.
[5] . 自尊水平对中学生人际交往的影响及其干预研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2016, 4(1): 47-52.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张红川, 苏 凇, 吕杰妤, 张 梅, 辛自强. 基于理性决策的财经能力:概念、结构与测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 465 -471 .
[2] 陈必忠. 社交网站积极自我呈现与主观幸福感:多重中介模型[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 528 -536 .
[3] 辛志勇. 加强社会心理服务重在专业人才建设[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 591 -592 .
[4] 孙 铃, 宋晓星, 周战强, 孟祥轶, 辛自强. 财经知识的概念、结构和测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 459 -464 .
[5] 辛志勇, 于泳红, 辛自强. 财经价值观研究进展及其概念结构分析[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[6] 胡锦慧, 辛 聪, 陈幼贞. 编码方式和线索显著性对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 537 -542 .
[7] 毕重增. 社会心理服务中的对象化和主题化及其整合[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 593 .
[8] 寇彧. 亲社会心态培育是社会心理服务的重要内容[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 595 .
[9] 潘超超, 周爱保, 刘锦涛, 谢 珮. 情绪诱发情景下情绪面孔的注意偏向研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 600 -605 .
[10] 王景玉, 曲可佳. 学习判断的线索利用模型及其潜在机制[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 629 -640 .