道德情绪对大学生亲社会行为的影响

doi:10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2018.12.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探讨不同效价的道德情绪对大学生亲社会行为的影响，以道德情绪为自变量，亲社会行为为因变量，采用情绪诱发实验、内隐联想测验(IAT)和大学生亲社会倾向量表相结合的方法，对60名本科生进行了测验。结果发现:(1)内隐联想测验效应显著，大学生存在内隐亲社会行为；(2)大学生的内隐亲社会行为得分与外显的情绪性亲社会行为、依从性亲社会行为、利他性亲社会行为、匿名性亲社会行为、紧急性亲社会行为、公开性亲社会行为的得分以及亲社会行为总分无显著相关；(3)大学生积极道德情绪组与消极道德情绪组在外显亲社会行为总分以及情绪性、依从性、利他性、匿名性、公开性、紧急性等各个维度的得分显著高于中性情绪组；(4)与中性情绪组相比，大学生在积极道德情绪组表现出更为显著的内隐亲社会行为，但消极道德情绪组与积极、中性情绪组的内隐亲社会行为得分并无显著差异。因此，大学生的亲社会行为存在明显的分离效应，即亲社会行为具有外显性和内隐性，两者具有相对独立的结构；积极道德情绪能够激发大学生的外显和内隐亲社会行为，消极道德情绪能够激发大学生的外显亲社会行为，但不一定激发大学生的内隐亲社会行为。

关键词: 道德情绪, 亲社会行为, 内隐联想测验

Abstract: In order to explore the influence of moral emotions with different valence on the prosocial behavior of college students, this study takes moral emotion as the independent variable and prosocial behavior as the dependent variable, tested 60 undergraduates with the method of Emotional Induction Experiment and Implicit Association Test (IAT) and the College Student Prosocial Tendency Scale. The results illustrate that (1) the effect of the implicit association test is significant and college students have implicit prosocial behavior; (2) undergraduate scores of implicit prosocial behavior have no significant correlation with the scores of explicit emotional prosocial behavior, compliant prosocial behavior, altruistic prosocial behavior, anonymity prosocial behavior, urgent prosocial behavior, open prosocial behavior and the total scores of prosocial behaviors; (3) the positive moral emotion group and the negative moral emotion group of college students scored significantly higher than the neutral emotion group in the total scores of explicit prosocial behavior and the scores of emotionality, compliance, altruism, anonymity, openness and urgency;(4) compared with the neutral emotion group, college students showed more significant implicit prosocial behavior in the positive moral emotion group, but there are no striking differences in the scores of the implicit prosocial behavior of negative moral emotion group and the positive and neutral emotion group. Therefore, the prosocial behavior of college students has obvious separation effect, that is, prosocial behavior is explicit and implicit, and the two have relatively independent structure; positive moral emotion can stimulate the explicit and implicit prosocial behavior of college students. Negative moral emotions can stimulate the explicit prosocial behavior of college students, but they do not necessarily stimulate the implicit prosocial behavior of college students.

Key words: moralemotion;prosocialbehavior, the implicit association test

中图分类号:

B842.6

田俊美, 刘丹丹, 卢富荣. 道德情绪对大学生亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(12): 714-721.

TIAN Junmei, LIU Dandan, LU Furong. The Effect of Moral Emotion on the Prosocial Behavior of College Students[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(12): 714-721.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	胥兴春, 李欢, 刘雅丽. 自尊与亲社会行为的关系：来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2021, 9(8): 449-460.
[2]	吕国庆, 周琰. 意义幸福倾向与幸福感的关系：亲社会行为和基本心理需要的多重中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2021, 9(2): 95-101.
[3]	聂婷婷, 石文典. 社会比较对大学生亲社会行为的影响：性别的调节作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2020, 8(4): 220-226.
[4]	王亚如, 张丽. 负债感的最新研究进展[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2020, 8(3): 172-184.
[5]	季思姚刘岩 . 观点采择对助人意愿的影响：情景建构的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2020, 8(11): 641-.
[6]	姚薇, 王柳生, 李皓. 大学生羞耻情绪对亲社会行为的影响研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(1): 34-38.
[7]	. 感恩与亲社会行为的关系：来自元分析的证据[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(7): 385-405.
[8]	. 内隐与外显亲社会倾向的影响因素研究：自尊的中介效应[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2016, 4(6): 356-364.
[9]	. 强化军人亲社会行为持续培育核心价值观[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2016, 4(5): 313-316.
[10]	. 贫困大学生内隐亲社会倾向研究 [J]. 心理技术与应用, 2016, 4(3): 144-149.