心理技术与应用 ›› 2021, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1): 20-21.doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2021.01.003

• • 上一篇    下一篇

脱贫内生动力量表的编制

吴 娜,解智宇,傅安国   

  1. (1 西南大学心理学部,重庆 400715)(2 海南大学管理学院,海口 570228)
  • 出版日期:2021-01-01 发布日期:2021-01-05
  • 基金资助:
    本文得到2019年海南省基础与应用基础研究计划(自然科学领域)高层次人才项目基金(项目号:2019RC138)、海南省自然科学基金面上项目(项目号:718MS036)和国家社科基金青年项目(项目号:17CMZ042)的支持。

Development of the Endogenous Power Scale for Poverty Elimination

WU Na; XIE Zhiyu; FU Anguo   

  1. (1 Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)(2 School of Management, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)
  • Online:2021-01-01 Published:2021-01-05

摘要: 为编制脱贫内生动力量表,并检验其信效度。本文通过文献检索、扎根理论与深度访谈形成问卷的初始项目。选取412名被试进行初测并进行相关分析、项目分析和探索性因素分析,再根据结果对问卷进行修订。另外选取422名被试进行正式施测并进行验证性因素分析。然后,将这两个步骤获取的数据用来进行信度和效度分析。结果表明:脱贫内生动力量表包含20个项目,由价值观、自我观、脱贫行为倾向三个维度构成,共解释总变异的69.57%,验证性因素分析显示问卷具有良好的结构效度。效标关联效度分析显示,脱贫内生动力总分与生活满意度(r=0.60)和悦纳进取(r=0.72)相关显著。总问卷的Cronbach's α系数为0.94,价值观、自我观和脱贫行为倾向三个维度的Cronbach's α系数为0.89、0.82、0.82,组合信度分别为0.89、0.81、0.83。本研究编制的脱贫内生动力量表信度和效度良好,可以用于相关的贫困心理研究与心理扶贫实践。

关键词: 脱贫内生动力, 心理扶贫, 量表编制, 信度与效度

Abstract: This study aimed to develop the Endogenous Power Scale for Poverty Elimination (EPSPE) and test its validity and reliability. The preliminary stages of the study comprised a literature review, grounded theory, and open questionnaires administered to 412 participants. The results were analyzed, and the questionnaire was revised according to the results of  item analysis, correlation analysis, and exploratory factor analysis. Second, the revised questionnaire was administered to 500 participants, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was applied to the 422 valid questionnaires. The data from these two steps were then used for reliability and validity analysis. The Positive Acceptance and Striving Scale (PASC) and the Orientations to Happiness Scale (OHS) were used to test the criterion validity. The final questionnaire consisted of 20 items along three dimensions: values, self-concept, and behavioral tendency of poverty alleviation, which explained 69.57% of the variance. The results of the CFA showed that the questionnaire fitted the data with good construct validity. The EPSPE scores were positively correlated with the OHS and PASC scores (p<0.01). The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total questionnaire was 0.94 and 0.82-0.89 for the three dimensions, while the composite reliability was 0.81-0.89 for the three dimensions. The EPSPE has satisfactory reliability and validity and meets the need of psychometrics, and is suitable for use in both poverty psychology research and poverty alleviation practice.

Key words: endogenous power for poverty elimination, psychological poverty alleviation, scale development, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • B841.7
[1] . 一般元思维与情境元思维量表的编制[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2016, 4(6): 365-375.
[2] . 大学生智能手机依赖的结构及量表编制[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2016, 4(4): 250-256.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙 铃, 宋晓星, 周战强, 孟祥轶, 辛自强. 财经知识的概念、结构和测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 459 -464 .
[2] 辛志勇, 于泳红, 辛自强. 财经价值观研究进展及其概念结构分析[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[3] 韦 晓, 兰继军. 近10年我国心理学研究现状与趋势分析——以第14~19届全国心理学大会论文分布为例[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[4] 胡锦慧, 辛 聪, 陈幼贞. 编码方式和线索显著性对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 537 -542 .
[5] 袁上清, 孙 铁, 郑鹭鸣, 肖 风. 应激对不同动态条件的内隐时间特征的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 543 -548 .
[6] 陈雪峰. 用第三方评估促进社会心理服务体系建设[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 583 -586 .
[7] 赵然. EAP发展对社会心理服务体系建设的启发[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 587 .
[8] 池丽萍. 对社会心理服务体系建设实践的反思[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 588 -589 .
[9] 向光璨, 郭 成, 滕召军, 崔瑞芳. 父母与同伴依恋对大学新生心理适应性的影响:社会支持与希望感的多元中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 606 -612 .
[10] . 五种角色自主学习: 一种组织讨论的技术[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2016, 4(1): 1 -7 .