Psychology: Techniques and Application

Psychology: Techniques and Application ›› 2017, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (10): 619-627.doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2017.10.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Comparison of Referential Communication Learning between Two Sides under Different Communication Situations

ZHANG Hengchao   

  1. (Department of Psychology, School of Law, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)
  • Online:2017-10-01 Published:2017-10-01

PDF (PC)

783

Abstract: The study used referential communication paradigm to compare the learning characteristics of both sides of the referential communication under different shared conditions. The results showed that: Under the condition of low score group, the score in the shared language + object + expression condition was significantly higher than the other conditions. The shared language condition was significantly higher than the shared language + object condition. There was no significant difference between high and low groups in the shared language + object + expression condition. The number of relative dimension in the shared language condition was significantly more than the other conditions, the shared language + object + expressions condition was significantly more than the shared language + object condition. The number of irrelevant dimension in the shared language + object condition was significantly more than the other conditions. The high score group was significantly less than the low group. The results suggested that: The score difference among the shared conditions only appeared in the low group. Shared expression promoted learning effect, and shared object reduced learning effect. The levels of cognitive and behavioral coordination between both sides were higher in the shared language + object + expression condition. The level of the directivity of selective attention was the highest in the shared language condition, and the level of the concentration of selective attention was the lowest in the shared language + object condition.

Key words: referential communication; shared condition; learning

CLC Number: 

  • B842.3
[1] YU Xinyue, YIN Mengyan, ZHAO Yafei, XIN Sufei. A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis of Changes in Chinese College Students' Learning Burnout [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(2): 74-83.
[2] YUAN Yuan. The Roles of Executive Function on Creative Insight [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2019, 7(9): 565-572.
[3] WANG Jingyu, QU Kejia, . Cue Integration and Its Validity in Judgment of Learning [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2019, 7(7): 433-440.
[4] HU Jinhui, XIN Cong, CHEN Youzhen. Effects of Encoding Strategies and the Salience of Cues on Prospective Memory [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 537-542.
[5] . Influence of English Word Pairs Difficulty and Learning Ways on Memory Accuracy [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(2): 73-78.
[6] . Which Emotion is More Benefit for Undergraduate Athletes Working Memory:Evidence from the Heart Rate Variability [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2017, 5(9): 513-520.
[7] . The Effect of Professional Identity on Learning Engagement:A Multiple Mediation Model [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2017, 5(9): 536-541.
[8] . Online Irrational Consumption: Analysis from Psychological Perspective [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2017, 5(5): 308-317.
[9] . The Influence of College Students Autonomy Strategies on Learning Performance with Moderating Effect of Learning Motivation [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2017, 5(2): 89-98.
[10] . Effect of Selfcontrol on College Students Academic Procrastination: Moderated Mediating Effect [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2016, 4(4): 209-214.
[11] . Positive Effect in Attention and Memory: Paradox of Aging [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2016, 4(2): 92-96.
[12] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2016, 4(1): 1-7.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] LIU Yang, LIU Xiaomeng, LI Shuangyi, WAN Zaojun, YUAN Yuan. The Impact of Parental Leadership on Job Satisfaction: the Mediation Effect of Supervisor-subordinate Relationship[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 513 -521 .
[2] HAN Pu, ZHANG Feng, LEI Xiuya. The Relationships of Childrens Kinetic School Drawings and its Self-sense of Power[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 522 -527 .
[3] LIN Tong, WANG Juan. Research on Spoken Word Comprehension in Visual World Paradigm[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 570 -576 .
[4] XIN Ziqiang, ZHANG Hongchuan, SUN Ling, YU Yonghong, XIN Zhiyong. The Definition and Triarchic Structure of Financial Literacy[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 450 -458 .
[5] ZHANG Jingjing, YU Zhenzhen, TIAN Hao. An Integrated Model of Emotion and Ration on Pro-environmental Behavior: The Role of Ecological Emotion Involvement[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 484 -492 .
[6] YU Xide, LU Cheng, GAO Dingguo. The relationships among Feeling of the Passage of Time,  Time Perspective and Personality[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 493 -502 .
[7] CHEN Bizhong. Positive Self-presentation in Social Network Sites and Subjective Well-being:A Multi-mediation Model[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 528 -536 .
[8] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 595 .
[9] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 597 -598 .
[10] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 577 -578 .