心理技术与应用 ›› 2016, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3): 154-159.doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2016.03.006

• • 上一篇    下一篇

不同立场大学生恋爱分手归因比较 

朱海燕;宋志一;邓芸菁;熊艳;陈蓉   

  1. (云南师范大学心理系,昆明650092)
  • 出版日期:2016-03-01 发布日期:2016-03-01

Comparing Different Attributions of the Breakingup of College Romance From Different Positions

ZHU Haiyan;SONG Zhiyi;DENG Yunjing;XIONG Yan;CHEN Rong   

  1. (Department of Psychology,Yunnan Normal University ,Kunming 650092, China)
  • Online:2016-03-01 Published:2016-03-01

摘要: 为探索大学生在不同立场下恋爱分手归因的差异,应用自编情境问卷,要求129名大学生评定影响分手因素的重要性程度。结果表明:(1)男、女生在旁观者立场上的评定不存在显著差异;(2)女方主动分手立场下,分手归因主要为养成因素,而男方被动分手立场下,更归因于家庭因素。这说明不同立场下男、女方分手在四个分手归因的重要性评定上存在明显不同,女生更强调养成因素和精神追求的影响,而男生对家庭因素和个人相貌影响力的评定较高。

关键词: 被动分手;主动分手;归因偏差; 横断面调查

Abstract: Objective: To discuss the different attributions of the college romances breakingup from different opinions. Method: 159 normal university students were surveyed with the selfdesigned questionnaires. They were required to assess the important degree of each factor which affects the romance breakingup on a single scale from different positions. Result:(1) On the position of a bystander,there was no significant difference between the male and female assessors on the four factors.(2)The degrees of the four factors’ importance were significant different when they were assessed from two positions,initiatively parting or the passively parting position. The sex and the position factors had no interaction on the form factor,spiritual pursuit factor and personal appearance factor,except on the family factor.(3) Positions and parting factors had significant interaction on assessing the importance of the factor. The female students on the position of initiatively parting believed that the four effect factors have different effects on the parting. The importance ordered as follows: Form factor,spiritual pursuit factor,family factor and personal appearance factor. However,for the male on the position of passively parting,the order was as follows: Family factor,form factor,spiritual pursuit factor,and personal appearance. Conclusion: The importance degree of the four parting factors were significant different between female of initiatively parting and male of passively parting. Female students were more emphasis on the effects of form factor and spiritual pursuit factor,but on male students’ opinion, family factor was the most important factor,and personal appearance factor was more effect on the parting.

Key words: passively parting; initiatively; attribution bias; crosssectional study

中图分类号: 

  • B844
[1] 尤清秀, 秦亚平. 青少年羞怯对社交焦虑的影响:自我接纳和评价恐惧的多重中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2020, 8(12): 755-762.
[2] 雷泽宇, 乌云特娜, 金童林. 中学生内在生活目标与主观幸福感的关系:基本心理需求的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2021, 9(5): 313-320.
[3] 宋彩荣, 陈 明, 李伟强, 李莉红, 李媛媛. 领悟社会支持对大学生抑郁的影响:社交回避及苦恼和核心自我评价的链式中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2020, 8(7): 423-430.
[4] 王梓昕, 何清华. 大学生财经素养现状及其影响因素研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2020, 8(4): 206-213.
[5] 赖燕群, 杨 琪, 牛更枫, 黄宝珍, 王瑞乐. 家庭功能与青少年欺负和受欺负的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用    [J]. 心理技术与应用, 2020, 8(3): 164-171.
[6] 池丽萍, 辛自强. 各类人群社会心理的时代变迁[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2020, 8(2): 95-103.
[7] 张 颖, 边玉芳. 父母对子女与情绪词联结的内隐态度及与情绪预测的关系: 基于内隐联想测验(IAT)的发现[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(12): 714-722.
[8] 肖凯文, 段锦云, 田晓明. 女职工在组织行为中的优势及局限性[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(12): 756-768.
[9] 王薇薇, 刘 文. 儿童互惠行为的产生机制及影响因素[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(7): 424-432.
[10] 齐春辉, 张 振, 张倩倩. 大学新生观点采择、人际信任在自我控制与攻击中的链式中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(7): 409-415.
[11] 田 园, 刘富丽, 苏彦捷. 3~6岁儿童对消极情绪的理解:抑制控制与共情的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(6): 321-331.
[12] 余 萌, 俞晨芳, 苏彦捷. 4~6岁儿童的来生信念:父母来生信念和死亡相关话题亲子谈话的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7(1): 23-33.
[13] . 祖父母教养方式与初中生学校活动卷入的关系:物质主义价值观和行为自我调节能力的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(5): 262-273.
[14] . 学习障碍儿童和正常儿童的眼跳特征差异研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2017, 5(12): 705-713.
[15] . 家庭社会经济地位对青少年抑郁的影响:自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2017, 5(12): 723-727.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙 铃, 宋晓星, 周战强, 孟祥轶, 辛自强. 财经知识的概念、结构和测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 459 -464 .
[2] 辛志勇, 于泳红, 辛自强. 财经价值观研究进展及其概念结构分析[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 472 -483 .
[3] 韦 晓, 兰继军. 近10年我国心理学研究现状与趋势分析——以第14~19届全国心理学大会论文分布为例[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 503 -512 .
[4] 胡锦慧, 辛 聪, 陈幼贞. 编码方式和线索显著性对前瞻记忆的影响[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 537 -542 .
[5] 袁上清, 孙 铁, 郑鹭鸣, 肖 风. 应激对不同动态条件的内隐时间特征的作用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 543 -548 .
[6] 陈雪峰. 用第三方评估促进社会心理服务体系建设[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 583 -586 .
[7] 张红川, 苏 凇, 吕杰妤, 张 梅, 辛自强. 基于理性决策的财经能力:概念、结构与测量[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(8): 465 -471 .
[8] 黄梓航, 王 可, 蔡华俭, . 利用开放数据进行心理学研究[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(9): 549 -569 .
[9] 张红川. 从转化研究的角度理解心理学在社会服务中的功用[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 580 -581 .
[10] 赵然. EAP发展对社会心理服务体系建设的启发[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2018, 6(10): 587 .