Psychology: Techniques and Application ›› 2017, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (10): 628-637.doi: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2017.10.007

Previous Articles    

Research Paradigm and Decision Quality Evaluation for Group Decision Making

SUN Dongqing; XIN Ziqiang   

  1. (School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2017-10-01 Published:2017-10-01

Abstract: Compared with individual decision making, group decision making plays an important role in modern production and life. In this paper, we firstly reviewed the research of group decision making from two aspects: one is the research paradigm of group decision making, and the other is the evaluation method of decision quality. Then, we put forward the processoutcome model to evaluate the group decision process, which can make up for the disadvantage of the existing researches. We tried to evaluate the group decision making in four dimensions, the information processing, interpersonal interaction, objective result and subjective feeling of the task. Finally, we prospected the future evaluation system based on the model.

Key words: group decision making; research paradigm; processoutcome model

CLC Number: 

  • B841
[1] ZHOU Wenjie, GUO Lei. Incorporating Covariates Information in Polytomous Responses Cognitive Diagnosis Model [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2021, 9(8): 484-494.
[2] WU Xuyao, HUANG Xu, LI Jing. Development and Validation of Digital Hoarding Behavior Scale [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2021, 9(2): 116-125.
[3] WU Na, XIE Zhiyu, FU Anguo. Development of the Endogenous Power Scale for Poverty Elimination [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2021, 9(1): 20-21.
[4] REN Yujie, ISHIZU Kenichiro. Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Over-adaptation Scale in Chinese Undergraduates [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2021, 9(1): 30-40.
[5] LIU Ying, WANG Xinjian. The Reliability and Validity Tests of Chinese Physician-Patient Social Mentality Questionnaire-Patient Section in Minority Areas [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(7): 386-396.
[6] ZHANG Zirui, LV Xiaokang. Measurement Invariance of the Chinese Physician-Patient Trust Scales Across Gender [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(7): 397-405.
[7] JIANG He , ZHAO Li. Measurement Invariance of the Sub-questionnaires of Chinese Physician-Patient Social Mentality Questionnaire Across Gender [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(7): 406-413.
[8] ZHANG Chao, ZHANG Wenyan, LIU Wenlan, ZHANG Hao. Development of Scale of Awe of College Students [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(4): 243-251.
[9] YANG Yakun, ZHU Shihao, LIU Xinling. A Method of Q-matrix Estimation Based on Item Fit Statistic RMSEA [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(1): 51-59.
[10] SHE Ai, WEI Guangbin, ZENG Lianping. Measurement Invariance of the Work-Family Balance Questionnaire in Different Genders [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2020, 8(1): 60-64.
[11] WANG Xiaoling, JIA Ning. Development, Revision and Application of Metacognitive Questionnaire (MCQ) for Anxiety Disorder [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2019, 7(12): 746-755.
[12] ZHANG Juncheng, HUANG Yingjie, ZHANG Shuying, LIU Dege, QU Shuguang. The Measurement and Individual Differences of College Students' Work Volition [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2019, 7(10): 629-640.
[13] YAN Zhiqiang, LIU Yue, PEI Meng, SU Yanjie. Revision and Validation of the Empathy Questionnaire [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2019, 7(9): 514-522.
[14] WANG Xieshun, SU Yanjie. Revision of QCAE Empathy Scale for Chinese Adolescents [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2019, 7(9): 536-547.
[15] YANG Xiaofeng, LI Wei, ZHENG Xue. Development of Trait Forgiveness Questionnaire for College Students [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2019, 7(8): 472-484.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] XIN Ziqiang, ZHANG Hongchuan, SUN Ling, YU Yonghong, XIN Zhiyong. The Definition and Triarchic Structure of Financial Literacy[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 450 -458 .
[2] ZHANG Jingjing, YU Zhenzhen, TIAN Hao. An Integrated Model of Emotion and Ration on Pro-environmental Behavior: The Role of Ecological Emotion Involvement[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 484 -492 .
[3] YU Xide, LU Cheng, GAO Dingguo. The relationships among Feeling of the Passage of Time,  Time Perspective and Personality[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(8): 493 -502 .
[4] LIU Yang, LIU Xiaomeng, LI Shuangyi, WAN Zaojun, YUAN Yuan. The Impact of Parental Leadership on Job Satisfaction: the Mediation Effect of Supervisor-subordinate Relationship[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 513 -521 .
[5] HAN Pu, ZHANG Feng, LEI Xiuya. The Relationships of Childrens Kinetic School Drawings and its Self-sense of Power[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 522 -527 .
[6] LIN Tong, WANG Juan. Research on Spoken Word Comprehension in Visual World Paradigm[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 570 -576 .
[7] CHEN Bizhong. Positive Self-presentation in Social Network Sites and Subjective Well-being:A Multi-mediation Model[J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(9): 528 -536 .
[8] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 595 .
[9] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 597 -598 .
[10] . [J]. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 2018, 6(10): 577 -578 .